As an Amazon Associate, Akermin earns from qualifying purchases. Product links on this page are affiliate links.
KLEIN TOOLS · Klein Tools ET110 CO Meter with Exposure Limit Alarm
View on AmazonPrice and availability are shown on Amazon and can change at any time.
A handheld carbon monoxide meter with a reading span of 0 to 1000 ppm, a backlit display that also shows temperature in Fahrenheit and Celsius, audible and visual alerts, and three alarm points: a low alarm at 35 ppm, a high alarm at 200 ppm, and a short term exposure limit alarm. The first two thresholds are drawn from recognised occupational guidance, which is a genuine mark in its favour. The third is named without a value, and no accuracy figure appears anywhere in the bullets.
Thirty five and two hundred are borrowed from exposure practice
Most alarm thresholds in consumer gas instruments are chosen by the marketing department. These two were not.
Thirty five parts per million is the recommended exposure limit published by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health for carbon monoxide, expressed as an average across an eight hour working day. Two hundred parts per million is the ceiling in the same recommendation, a level not to be exceeded at any instant. An instrument that alarms at both is an instrument whose alarm points mean something outside its own packaging.
That matters more than it sounds. A threshold you can look up is a threshold you can defend to a client, a landlord or a supervisor. A threshold chosen by the manufacturer tells you only that the manufacturer considers the level worth flagging.
It also tells you who the meter is for. These are workplace numbers, not household comfort numbers, and they are a long way below the concentrations at which a domestic alarm is designed to sound. A technician using this will see the low alarm in situations a household alarm would ignore entirely, which is the correct behaviour for an investigative tool and a nuisance in a dwelling.
A short term exposure alarm with no stated limit or window
The second bullet describes a built-in short-term exposure limit alarm and leaves it there.
A short term exposure limit is a specific kind of threshold. It is not an instantaneous reading, and it is not a full shift average. It is a concentration averaged over a short defined window, fifteen minutes by convention, and it exists because a sharp exposure for a quarter of an hour can do harm that a comfortable eight hour average completely conceals. A worker in a plant room at 150 ppm for twenty minutes and clean air for the rest of the day has an eight hour average that looks fine.
So to deliver what the phrase promises, the instrument has to keep a rolling average over a stated window and compare it against a stated number. Those are two pieces of information, and the listing publishes neither. It is not clear whether the alarm follows the fifteen minute convention, whether its threshold matches any published figure, or whether the averaging window can be seen on the display while it accumulates.
This is the one specification gap on the page with a safety dimension, because an alarm you cannot characterise is an alarm you cannot rely on or explain. Establish the value in writing before putting the function to work.
The word precision, and the tolerance that never appears
The opening bullet is headed accurate carbon monoxide measurement and promises detection and measurement of levels with precision.
No tolerance follows, here or anywhere else. There is no percentage of reading, no fixed offset in parts per million, no sub range over which a tighter figure applies, and no repeatability statement.
Against a 35 ppm alarm point that absence has teeth. Suppose the true concentration in a boiler room is 32 ppm. A meter good to two parts per million tells you that you are below the threshold and climbing. A meter good to ten parts per million might show 42 and send you looking for a leak that is not there, or show 24 and leave a real exposure unflagged. The reading is the same shape in all three cases. Only the tolerance distinguishes them, and it is not on the page.
Accuracy and precision are also not the same property, and listings use the words interchangeably. Precision is how closely repeated readings of an unchanging concentration cluster together. Accuracy is how close that cluster sits to the truth. A meter can be beautifully precise and consistently wrong, which is exactly what an uncalibrated electrochemical cell drifting with age looks like.
Response time is the figure carbon monoxide work turns on
There is a second absence worth as much as the first, and almost nobody looks for it.
Carbon monoxide investigation is a moving process. You walk a room, pass a flue, hold the inlet near a draught diverter, step back, move on. What you learn depends on how fast the instrument reacts to a change in concentration, which is normally quoted as the time to reach ninety percent of a step change. A cell that takes half a minute to settle will not resolve the difference between a spill at the appliance and clean air a pace away, because you will have moved before the number arrives.
The listing says nothing about response time, nor about the sensor type, nor about warm up behaviour from a cold start. Nor is there a statement about expected sensor life, a calibration interval, or whether a bump test is possible, all of which matter on a consumable sensing element. Our note on why gas sensor response time matters goes through the step change behaviour in more detail.
What the five bullets publish, and what they do not
| Property | Listing content |
|---|---|
| Carbon monoxide reading span | 0 to 1000 ppm |
| Low alarm point | 35 ppm |
| High alarm point | 200 ppm |
| Short term exposure alarm | Present, value not published |
| Alert method | Audible and visual |
| Display | Backlit, carbon monoxide plus temperature |
| Temperature units | Fahrenheit and Celsius |
| Averaging window behind the exposure alarm | Not stated in the listing bullets |
| Tolerance on the gas reading | Not stated in the listing bullets |
| Smallest increment displayed | Not stated in the listing bullets |
| Time to ninety percent of a step change | Not stated in the listing bullets |
| Sensing technology | Not stated in the listing bullets |
| Expected sensor life and calibration interval | Not stated in the listing bullets |
| Temperature span and tolerance | Not stated in the listing bullets |
| Ingress protection and drop rating | Not stated in the listing bullets |
| Power source and runtime | Not stated in the listing bullets |
Set against the rest of this category the shape is familiar: the behaviour of the instrument is described well and its metrology is not described at all. What lifts this listing above the average is that the two published alarm points are externally anchored, which is rarer than it should be. Readings against those points are compared in our roundup of carbon monoxide meters.
Meter duty and alarm duty are different jobs
This suits a technician, a landlord or an inspector who needs a number rather than a warning: checking a flue after service, investigating a complaint of headaches in an office, sweeping a plant room before working in it, or confirming that an appliance is spilling. The exposure based alarm points, the audible and visual alerts and the portable format all fit that use, and the temperature readout is a sensible companion on combustion work.
It does not suit anyone looking for protection while they are not paying attention. A meter alarms to the person holding it; a residential detector is built to sit on a ceiling for years and wake a household, and it is tested against a standard written for that purpose. Buying a meter instead of an alarm swaps a safety device for a diagnostic one. The distinction is set out in our comparison of a carbon monoxide meter against a CO alarm, and the short version is that a house needs the alarm and an investigator needs the meter.
The reservation to carry into the decision is the empty tolerance row. If your readings only ever inform your own next step, you can live with it. If anyone else is going to act on the number, get the accuracy figure and the exposure alarm value confirmed in writing first.
Recommended Tools
Products shown because their documented specifications fit this guide. Price and availability are on Amazon and can change.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where do 35 ppm and 200 ppm come from?
They line up with long standing occupational guidance for carbon monoxide in the United States. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommends 35 parts per million as an eight hour time weighted average and sets 200 parts per million as a ceiling that should not be exceeded at any moment. Publishing those two as the low and high alarm points means the thresholds relate to something external and checkable rather than being chosen to look reassuring.
What is a STEL and why does it matter that the value is missing?
A short term exposure limit is a concentration averaged over a short window, conventionally fifteen minutes, which recognises that a brief high exposure can be harmful even when the full shift average looks acceptable. To act as a STEL alarm an instrument has to hold a rolling average over a defined window and compare it against a defined threshold. The listing names the function and publishes neither the window nor the threshold, so you cannot tell what it is watching.
Does this replace a carbon monoxide alarm at home?
No, and it is not sold as one. A residential alarm is designed to sit unattended for years, to sound at levels and over durations set by a product standard, and to wake a sleeping household. A meter is designed to be carried, pointed and read by someone investigating. The two have different alarm logic for good reason. A meter is the right tool for finding where carbon monoxide is coming from and the wrong tool for the thing that protects you while you sleep.
What accuracy does the listing claim?
None, in figures. The first bullet promises accurate measurement with precision and the fifth states the reading span as 0 to 1000 ppm, but no tolerance appears anywhere, in percentage terms or in parts per million. For a reading that will be compared against a 35 ppm threshold, the difference between a meter good to a couple of parts per million and one good to ten is the difference between a decision and a guess.
Why does a carbon monoxide meter display temperature?
Two reasons, one of them better than the other. The useful one is that carbon monoxide investigation almost always means combustion appliances, flues and air handling, and surface or air temperature is a routine part of that picture. The second is that an electrochemical cell responds differently at different temperatures, so the instrument needs to know its own temperature anyway and showing it on the same screen asks nothing extra of the hardware. The listing gives the units but no span or tolerance for the temperature reading either.
Affiliate disclosure: Akermin earns a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases made through links on this page. Our editorial picks are based on documented specifications and owner feedback, not commissions.
Related Guides
CPS LS790B Leak-Seeker Review: Non Combustible Is the Deciding Word
An ion pump refrigerant leak detector individually calibrated to find a leak rate better than a quarter of an ounce per year, with ten selectable sensitivity ranges, a water vapour filter and a bar graph plus tone display.
Read More→
BW Clip BWC2-H Review: Alarm Points Set Before the Clock Starts
A single gas hydrogen sulfide detector with one button operation, hibernation mode, automatic logging of the 35 most recent gas events and bump test results, and compatibility with IntelliDoX and MicroDock II docking.
Read More→
ALLOSUN Thermometer Hygrometer Review: Half a Metre of Lead and No Tolerance
A battery powered thermometer and hygrometer showing temperature, relative humidity and dew point, with a settable humidity alarm, a sensor on a lead of about 50 cm, maximum and minimum memory and a large LCD.
Read More→