As an Amazon Associate, Akermin earns from qualifying purchases. Product links on this page are affiliate links.
You calibrate an infrared thermometer by comparing its reading against a reference instrument on a surface of known and stable emissivity, then adjusting the instrument’s emissivity setting or offset if it allows one. For most fixed-emissivity consumer guns, including the Etekcity Lasergrip 774 and the Fluke 62 Max+, there is no user calibration adjustment at all, so the honest procedure is a verification check rather than a calibration. Only instruments that publish an adjustable emissivity control, such as the Etekcity dual laser model or the TempPro TempScan, give you a parameter to correct against a reference. No consumer infrared thermometer in this group publishes a calibration certificate or a method for field adjustment.
What a calibration check is actually comparing
An infrared thermometer does not measure temperature directly. It measures the infrared radiant power arriving at its detector, then converts that power to a temperature using the Stefan-Boltzmann relationship and an assumed emissivity value. The conversion is only correct if two things are true: the surface emits like the emissivity value the instrument assumes, and nothing between the surface and the lens is absorbing or emitting infrared energy of its own.
That means a calibration check is really a test of three separate things. First, whether the detector and its amplifier are reading radiant power correctly. Second, whether the emissivity assumption built into the firmware matches the surface you are pointing at. Third, whether the field of view is filled by the target, because a spot that spills over onto a cooler or warmer background will drag the reading toward that background.
Most home calibration attempts fail on the second and third points, not the first. A gun that reads 0.5 C low on a matte black plate may be perfectly linear and perfectly stable; the error is in the emissivity assumption, not the sensor. Adjusting the instrument to remove that error would make it wrong on every other surface. This is why the first question to ask is not how to calibrate but what, specifically, is wrong with the reading.
The ice bath does not calibrate an infrared thermometer
The ice bath is the standard reference for a contact probe: a well-stirred mixture of ice and water sits at the phase boundary and holds a stable temperature that a probe can be immersed in. It works because the probe touches the mixture and reaches thermal equilibrium with it.
An infrared thermometer never touches the mixture. It reads the infrared energy emitted by whatever surface it is aimed at. If you aim a gun at the surface of an ice bath, you are reading the emission of water, which has an emissivity of roughly 0.96, plus reflections of the room from the water surface, plus the emission of the container wall if the spot is wider than the bath. The result is a number that depends on the room, the container and the angle, not on the phase boundary. It is not a calibration reference.
The same objection applies to aiming at a pot of boiling water, a pan of oil, or a block of ice. Each of these is a surface with its own emissivity, its own reflections and its own temperature gradient. None of them is a blackbody, and none of them gives a number you can compare against a thermometer specification.
What a usable reference source looks like
A reference source for infrared work needs three properties: high and known emissivity, stable temperature, and a field of view large enough to fill the instrument’s spot at the distance you will use. A matte black surface with an emissivity above 0.95 satisfies the first. A stirred fluid bath or a temperature-controlled block satisfies the second. A plate wider than the spot diameter satisfies the third.
In practice, the most accessible reference is a contact thermometer you trust, placed in good thermal contact with a matte black plate, with the plate allowed to settle. The contact thermometer reads the plate temperature directly. The infrared gun reads the same plate from a distance. The difference is the combined error of the gun and its emissivity assumption.
Two cautions. First, the plate must be in a room with still air; a draught across the plate creates a temperature gradient that the contact probe and the infrared gun will sample at different points. Second, the plate must be large enough. A 12:1 gun at 36 cm has a spot roughly 3 cm across, so a plate of at least 10 cm square keeps the spot well inside the target. The Etekcity Lasergrip 774 listing states a 12:1 ratio and recommends 36 cm, which is a useful working distance to design the check around.
| Reference source | Suitable for IR calibration check | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Ice bath | No | Reads the water surface, not the phase boundary; reflections dominate |
| Boiling water | No | Same surface-emission problem, plus steam in the path |
| Matte black plate with contact probe | Yes, with care | High emissivity, stable if shielded from draughts, large enough to fill the spot |
| Commercial blackbody calibrator | Yes | Known emissivity and controlled temperature, but cost usually exceeds the gun |
| Another infrared gun | No | Two instruments with unknown errors do not produce a reference |
Emissivity is the only adjustment most guns offer
On instruments that publish an adjustable emissivity control, the correction procedure is straightforward. Point the gun at a reference surface whose true temperature is known from a contact probe, and whose emissivity is known. If the gun reads low, the assumed emissivity is too high; reduce it until the reading matches. If the gun reads high, raise it. The Etekcity dual laser model and the TempPro TempScan both publish a range of 0.1 to 1.0, which is the full physical range and enough to correct for most surfaces.
What this procedure does not do is correct a sensor that is genuinely out of specification. Emissivity adjustment changes the conversion constant, not the detector response. If the gun reads 3 C low on a matte black plate at 0.95 emissivity, adjusting emissivity to make that plate read correctly will leave the gun wrong on every other surface. The correct diagnosis in that case is that the instrument has drifted or was never accurate, and the correct action is replacement or factory service, not a field adjustment.
Fixed-emissivity instruments, which include the Lasergrip 774 and the Fluke 62 Max+ as their listings describe them, offer no such control. The listing for the Fluke publishes an accuracy figure of 1 C or 1 percent of reading from 0 to 650 C, but no field calibration procedure. The listing for the Etekcity publishes a range and a distance-to-spot ratio, but no accuracy figure and no calibration method. For these instruments the only honest check is a verification: measure a reference plate, record the difference, and decide whether the difference matters for your work.
Where the procedure stops and what to do instead
There is a hard limit to what a user can calibrate on a sealed consumer infrared thermometer. The detector, the amplifier and the firmware conversion are inside a housing with no published service access, no published adjustment points and no published calibration certificate. Opening the housing voids whatever warranty exists and does not give you a reference to adjust against. The listing for the Fluke 62 Max+ does not publish a calibration interval or a service procedure. The listing for the TempPro does not publish an accuracy figure beyond a percentage claim. The listing for the Etekcity dual laser publishes a range and an emissivity control but no accuracy figure.
Where the reading matters for safety or for a contractual measurement, the right instrument is not a handheld gun at all. A contact probe on a calibrated reference, or a fixed infrared sensor with a published calibration certificate, gives you a traceable number. A gun is a screening tool: it tells you whether a surface is hot, cold or changing, and it does so quickly and from a distance. It is not a metrology instrument, and treating it as one is the most common mistake in this category.
For readers who want to understand how the instrument is chosen in the first place, the guide to choosing an infrared thermometer covers distance-to-spot ratio, range and target surface. For a closer look at the two instruments named most often in this procedure, the Fluke 62 Max+ review and the Etekcity Lasergrip review set out what each listing does and does not publish. The same verification logic applies to other sensors: the method for calibrating a hygrometer uses a saturated salt reference rather than an ice bath for exactly the same reason, because the sensor must be exposed to a known environment rather than a convenient one.
The short version
You cannot calibrate a fixed-emissivity infrared thermometer in the field, and an ice bath will not do it. What you can do is verify the instrument against a matte black plate whose temperature you know from a contact probe, record the difference, and decide whether it matters. If the instrument publishes an adjustable emissivity control, use that control to correct the surface assumption, not to hide a sensor error. If the reading is safety-critical, use a traceable instrument instead of a gun.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I calibrate an infrared thermometer with an ice bath?
No. An ice bath is a reference for a contact probe that is immersed in it. An infrared thermometer reads the infrared energy emitted by the water surface, which includes reflections from the room and emission from the container. The number you get depends on the room and the container, not on the phase boundary, so it is not a calibration reference.
My gun has no emissivity setting. Can it still be calibrated?
Not in the sense of adjustment. You can verify it against a reference plate and record the difference, but there is no parameter to change. The Etekcity Lasergrip 774 and the Fluke 62 Max+ are described in their listings without an adjustable emissivity control, so the honest procedure is verification and, if the error matters, replacement or factory service.
What emissivity value should I set for a calibration check?
Use a reference surface with an emissivity you know, typically a matte black coating above 0.95, and set the instrument to that value. If the instrument reads correctly on that surface, the sensor is behaving. If it does not, the error is in the instrument, not in the surface assumption, and changing emissivity to hide it will make the gun wrong elsewhere.
How often should an infrared thermometer be checked?
The listings in this group do not publish a calibration interval. A practical approach is to check the instrument whenever a reading will be used to make a decision, and to record the result. A gun that has been dropped, stored in a hot vehicle or used near its maximum range should be checked before the next critical reading.
Why does my gun read differently from my contact thermometer?
Usually because the two instruments are measuring different things. A contact probe measures its own tip temperature after it reaches equilibrium with the surface. An infrared gun measures emitted infrared power and converts it using an assumed emissivity. On a shiny or low-emissivity surface the gun will read low, and on a surface reflecting a warm background it can read high. The difference is often the surface, not the instrument.
Can I use a second infrared thermometer as a reference?
No. Two instruments with unknown errors do not produce a reference. A usable reference needs a known temperature and a known emissivity, which means a contact probe on a stable plate or a commercial blackbody source. Comparing two guns tells you they disagree, not which one is right.